高度によって情報が変わる着陸地点のリスク選択

In aerospace systems, powered descent requires efficiently selecting a landing site while fine-scale hazards remain unresolvable until low altitude. This process presents a decision challenge since the actor must select a site and make corresponding actions before all information is known. To successfully solve this problem, an agent must reason over potential risks and make corrections as new observations are made. We introduce a lightweight model of altitude-limited information where each landing site is summarized by a mean score and a designed ambiguity proxy that contracts as the vehicle descends and senses within a cone-shaped footprint under an altitude-to-resolution schedule. Using this abstraction, we derive closed-form, risk-averse site scoring techniques (an entropic certainty-equivalent and a Gaussian Conditional Value at Risk surrogate) and pair them with greedy and exploratory planners to prioritize sites that are both high-value and robust to late-revealed terrain detail. These rollout-free heuristics improve lower-tail landing outcomes (1st percentile and certainty-equivalent) relative to mean-based baselines, with the largest gains when refinement occurs late and unresolved detail is large. We also demonstrate that these methods perform comparably to or better than Monte Carlo Tree Search baselines with orders-of-magnitude faster computation. Our results are supported by numerical simulations.