政党の分極化が選挙競争から生じる条件をモデル化

Why do political parties polarise when most voters remain in the centre? Moving beyond conventional point-based models, we address this classic puzzle by developing a spatial voting framework that conceptualises political parties as continuous ideological distributions. Operating under endogenous turnout, these parties adapt their positioning to maximise a combination of total votes and parliamentary representation. We demonstrate that this theoretical formulation reveals a distinct phase transition in multiparty competition, moving from centripetal convergence to centrifugal separation. These dual objectives do not necessarily reward the same directional party movement as voters only cast ballots for ideologically acceptable parties. The numerical results map the precise boundaries of this transition: a higher party count destabilises the centrist equilibrium and expands the zone of divergence, whereas pronounced internal party dispersion and a stronger emphasis on representation contract it. Furthermore, electoral institutions critically govern this divergence: when voter preferences vary across geographic districts, the same national electorate can trigger entirely different phase transitions depending on how votes are converted into seats. Together, our results show how party differentiation emerges endogenously from the dynamics of electoral competition itself. Whether small initial differences grow or decay is not merely a reflection of voter preferences, but an outcome dictated by party goals, competitor count, internal party breadth, and vote-to-seat conversion rules.