ロボット群の行動の違いを設計対象にする提案

No two robots are truly identical: calibration, battery state, sensor drift and wear give every swarm a distribution of behaviour rather than a single point, usually treated as an imperfection to be minimised. In animal collectives the reverse holds: consistent individual differences in behaviour ('temperament') are shaped by natural selection and often decisive for group performance. This perspective proposes 'temperament engineering', a bio-inspired framework that treats the swarm's distribution of temperaments, rather than the individual controller, as the design object. It borrows five evolutionarily validated axes of animal temperament (shyness-boldness, exploration-avoidance, activity, aggressiveness and sociability) as a design vocabulary, rendering each as a continuous control parameter $\tau \in [0,1]$ above the controller, realisable as a module threshold, a policy-conditioning vector in multi-agent reinforcement learning, or a constraint on a foundation-model planner. A three-phase workflow maps mission success criteria onto relevant axes, plans the shape of the $\tau$ distribution, and tunes reaction norms governing how temperament responds to environmental cues. The payoff is greatest under decentralisation: where a central planner can reassign behaviour online, a temperament distribution is a planner output, but in a swarm without global knowledge it must be an offline, anticipatory design input. Behavioural and platform heterogeneity are thereby co-design variables, and I sketch tentative robot-native axes (self-model plasticity, forcefulness, initiative and expressiveness) arising from features robots have and animals do not. Engineered heterogeneity has been shown to outperform homogeneous swarms in tasks such as aggregation and exploration; establishing when, and how much, heterogeneity repays its cost is the work the field can now take forward.