グラフの頂点を広げる規則の小さな違いで計算の難しさが変わる

Zero Forcing (ZF) and Power Dominating Set (PDS) mark vertices in a graph based on a common forcing process starting from a problem-specific set of initially marked vertices. ZF initially marks the selected vertices while PDS additionally marks their neighbors. In the forcing process, a marked vertex with only one unmarked neighbor may force that neighbor which then becomes marked, too. A solution marks the entire graph by exhaustive application of this rule. One variant generalizes the forcing threshold; vertices may force when they have a fixed number of $k$ unmarked neighbors. Another variant limits propagation to a fixed number of rounds. We classify the parameterized complexity of the problem variants obtained by combining these choices of initialization, round limit and forcing threshold. We show that with appropriate choices, these variants range in parameterized complexity from fixed-parameter tractable to complete for every even layer $W[2\ell]$ of the $W$-hierarchy, and up to $W[P]$-complete. Our results demonstrate that small changes in any one of these three dimensions can lead to a sharp change in problem complexity.