arXiv論文メモ
新着一覧
astro-ph · 査読状況未確認

遠方の巨大銀河団を集めるMACS計画の初期成果

MACS: The evolution and properties of massive clusters of galaxies

Harald Ebeling (IfA, Hawaii), Alastair Edge (Durham, UK), J. Patrick Henry (IfA, Hawaii)

短い要約(全文訳を準備中)

ROSATのX線全天調査を基に、遠方の重い銀河団を探すMACSの初期結果を報告した。赤方偏移0.3〜0.56の41銀河団を測定済みで、さらに85個の候補を分光観測する計画だった。明るい25個の予備解析では、特にX線が強い銀河団の数が過去ほど少ないという進化は、約0.4まで有意でないと暫定的に結論した。

v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。

初稿
2000-01-18(UTC)
最新改訂
2000-01-18 · v1
査読・掲載
査読状況未確認
arXivで読むPDF

更新履歴

取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。

原文の要旨

We present first results from the MAssive Cluster Survey (MACS), a new large-scale X-ray survey designed to find and characterize very massive, distant clusters of galaxies. Based on X-ray detections in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey, MACS aims to compile a sample of more than 200 X-ray luminous clusters at z>0.3, about 50 times the number of EMSS clusters in the same redshift and luminosity range. The MACS sample is uniquely suited to investigate cluster evolution at redshifts and luminosities poorly sampled by all existing surveys. At the time of writing the MACS sample comprises 41 clusters with measured redshifts of 0.3<z<0.56 and X-ray luminosities in excess of 6 10^44 erg/s (0.1-2.4 keV). This early sample is thus already twice as large as the high-z, high-luminosity subsets of the EMSS, BCS, and REFLEX cluster samples taken together. An additional 85 MACS clusters with photometric redshifts z>0.3 are scheduled for spectroscopic observation. From a preliminary analysis of a statistically well defined subsample of the 25 X-ray brightest MACS clusters we conclude tentatively that negative evolution is not significant at the highest X-ray luminosities (Lx>10^45 erg/s) out to redshifts of z~0.4. Our findings thus extend the no-evolution result obtained by many serendipitous ROSAT cluster surveys at lower luminosities.

著者のコメント

4 pages, 2 figures. Oral paper presented at the "Large-Scale Structure in the X-ray Universe" conference, Santorini, September 1999

arXiv ID: astro-ph/0001320 / 要約の誤りについて