arXiv論文メモ
新着一覧
astro-ph · 査読状況未確認

軽い元素の起源を三つの宇宙線模型で比較

LiBeB Evolution: Three Models

R. Ramaty, R. E. Lingenfelter, B. Kozlovsky

短い要約(全文訳を準備中)

リチウム・ベリリウム・ホウ素が増える過程を、宇宙線の供給源が異なる三模型で比較した。平均的な星間物質だけを源にする模型は必要エネルギーが過大と判断した。残る模型の識別には精密な元素比測定が必要で、宇宙線やちりの輸送による生成・供給の遅れも検討している。

v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。

初稿
2000-01-26(UTC)
最新改訂
2000-01-26 · v1
査読・掲載
査読状況未確認
arXivで読むPDF

更新履歴

取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。

原文の要旨

We consider the three principal LiBeB evolutionary models, CRI in which the cosmic-ray source at all epochs of Galactic evolution is the average ISM, CRI+LECR in which metal enriched low energy cosmic rays (LECRs) are superimposed onto the CRI cosmic rays, and CRS in which the cosmic-ray source, accelerated in superbubbles, is constant, independent of the ISM metallicity. By considering the evolutionary trend of log(Be/H) vs. both [Fe/H] and [O/H], we demonstrate that the CRI model is energetically untenable. We present evolutionary trends for B-11/B-10 and B/Be which, combined with future precision measurements, could distinguish between the CRS and CRI+LECR models. We show that delayed LiBeB synthesis in the CRS model, due to the transport of the cosmic rays, could explain why log(Be/H) is steeper vs. [O/H] than vs. [Fe/H]. We also show that delayed deposition of Fe into star forming regions, due to its incorporation into high velocity dust, could provide an explanation for the possible rise of [O/Fe] with decreasing [Fe/H]. Observations of refractory and volatile alpha-elements could test this scenario. There seems to be a need for pregalactic or extragalactic Li-6 sources.

著者のコメント

latex 10 pages, 7 double panel figures, uses newpasp.sty To appear in The Light Elements and Their Evolution, IAU Symp. 198, L. da Silva, M. Spite and R. de Medeiros, eds., ASP

arXiv ID: astro-ph/0001466 / 要約の誤りについて