arXiv論文メモ
新着一覧
astro-ph · 査読状況未確認

暗い降着流に強い風は必須か

On the absence of winds in ADAFs

Marek A. Abramowicz, Jean-Pierre Lasota, Igor V. Igumenshchev

短い要約(全文訳を準備中)

ブラックホールへ落ちる物質が光を効率よく出さない降着流には、強い流出が必須という議論を再検討した。理論と数値模型から、流出の有無は粘性や外側の境界条件などに依存すると示した。特定のエネルギー指標が正でも流出しない例があり、強い風は起こりうるが必須ではないと論じる。

v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。

初稿
2000-01-27(UTC)
最新改訂
2000-01-27 · v1
査読・掲載
査読状況未確認
arXivで読むPDF

更新履歴

取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。

原文の要旨

We show that recently published assertions that advection dominated accretion flows (ADAFs) require the presence of strong winds are unfounded because they assume that low radiative efficiency in flows accreting at low rates onto black holes implies vanishing radial energy and angular momentum fluxes through the flow (which is also formulated in terms of the `Bernoulli function' being positive). This, however, is a property only of self-similar solutions which are an inadequate representation of global accretion flows. We recall general properties of accretion flows onto black holes and show that such, necessarily transonic, flows may have either positive or negative Bernoulli function depending on the flow viscosity. Flows with low viscosities (alpha<0.1 in the alpha-viscosity model) have a negative Bernoulli function. Without exception, all 2-D and 1-D numerical models of low viscosity flows constructed to date experience no significant outflows. At high viscosities the presence of outflows depends on the assumed viscosity, the equation of state and on the outer boundary condition. The positive sign of the Bernoulli function invoked in this context is irrelevant to the presence of outflows. As an illustration, we recall 2-D numerical models with moderate viscosity that have positive values of the Bernoulli function and experience no outflows. ADAFs, therefore, do not differ from this point of view from thin Keplerian discs: they may have, but they do not have to have strong winds.

著者のコメント

7 pages, submitted to MNRAS on June 2, 1999, (positive) referee's report received on Oct 21, re-submitted on Dec 10

arXiv ID: astro-ph/0001479 / 要約の誤りについて