arXiv論文メモ
新着一覧
astro-ph · 査読状況未確認

初期宇宙の重水素量と通常物質の量を再検討

Baryonic Dark Matter and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis

Arnon Dar, Jaques Goldberg and Michael Rudzsky

短い要約(全文訳を準備中)

未公刊だった1991年の研究を提示し、予測した重水素と水素の比が1993年の遠方ガス雲の測定と合うと主張する。初期宇宙の元素合成から求める通常物質の総量は、見えている物質だけでも説明できるとの解釈を述べた。要旨は当時の観測との比較であり、現在の確定値を示すものではない。

v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。

初稿
1994-05-03(UTC)
最新改訂
1994-05-03 · v1
査読・掲載
査読状況未確認
arXivで読むPDF

更新履歴

取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。

原文の要旨

The enclosed paper was submitted for publication in Ap.J Lett. in February 1992. It has been rejected on the grounds that it predicts primordial Deuterium abundance which is contradicted by observations and because it disagreed with published analysis and conclusions of previous authors. However, in a recent article in NATURE (14 April 1994) Vol. 368 pp. 599-603, Songalia, Cowie, Hogan and Rugers describe a recent measurement (November 1993) with the Keck 10-m Telescope, of the Deuterium abundance in a high redshift cloud between us and a distant quasar. They find D/H\approx 1.9-2.5 x10^{-4} in good agreement with our prediction D/H=(2.1+\- 0.35)x10^{-4}, which is larger by an order of magnitude than believed before. Songalia et al. found that the baryon density inferred from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis is "consistent with the amount of presently observed luminous matter comprising all the baryons in the Universe" while we found the same. We post here our unpublished 1991 paper, which was reported in international conferences and was distributed only as a preprint, mainly because of its physics and its sad moral: If you submit for publication a correct paper with important results that contradict the "party line" it has only slim chances to be accepted for publication.

著者のコメント

12pages

arXiv ID: astro-ph/9405010 / 要約の誤りについて