宇宙背景放射の温度むらが生まれる仕組みを解説
The Nature versus Nurture of Anisotropies
短い要約(全文訳を準備中)
宇宙背景放射の温度むらを、光と通常物質の振動や光子の拡散から解析的に説明した。最終散乱面の厚みと小さな構造の減衰を統一的に扱い、二つの構造形成モデルを比較。原初の等曲率バリオンモデルは1〜10度で振動的でないむらが大きく、当時の実験と矛盾する可能性を指摘する。
v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。
- 初稿
- 1994-06-28(UTC)
- 最新改訂
- 1994-06-28 · v1
- 査読・掲載
- 査読状況未確認
更新履歴
- v1 1994-06-28 この版を読む
取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。
原文の要旨
With the rapidly growing number of cosmic microwave background measurements on various scales, there is real hope that the number of acceptable models for structure formation will be limited to a very few in the near future. Yet any given model can always be saved by introducing and tuning extraneous free parameters. To better understand this question of ``nature versus nurture'' for temperature fluctuations, it is useful to know not only the general features of anisotropy predictions but also their causes. Extracting the physical content of our other works, we present here a {\it simple} account of cosmic microwave background anisotropies on all scales. In particular, we show that analytic approximations can trace the structure of the so-called ``Doppler peaks,'' which arise due to the {\it adiabatic} oscillations in the photon-baryon fluid. We also show how the finite thickness of the last scattering surface and the Silk damping mechanism can be described in a unified way by photon diffusion. In order to present a specific example, we focus on comparing the primordial isocurvature baryon (PIB) model with the standard cold dark matter model (CDM). In particular, we explain why PIB generically predicts larger {\it non}-oscillatory anisotropies from the 1$^\circ$ to 10$^\circ$ scale which may already be in conflict with experiments.
著者のコメント
25 pages including 10 figures, uuencoded tarred postscript, to appear in the Proceedings of the Case Western CMB Meeting, CfPA-TH-94-31
arXiv ID: astro-ph/9406071 / 要約の誤りについて