arXiv論文メモ
新着一覧
astro-ph · 査読状況未確認

銀河団の周辺に遠方の電波天体が多いか検証

The Density of 1-Jansky Sources Around Zwicky Clusters

Stella Seitz and Peter Schneider

短い要約(全文訳を準備中)

電波で選んだクエーサーと銀河の標本を使い、ツビッキー銀河団との見かけの位置の相関を調べた。赤方偏移が約1の天体は周辺に有意に多い一方、さらに遠い天体では有意差がなかった。前者は重力レンズで説明できる可能性があるが、定量モデルは未検証。近距離の電波天体は逆に少なかった。

v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。

初稿
1994-08-30(UTC)
最新改訂
1994-08-30 · v1
査読・掲載
査読状況未確認
arXivで読むPDF

更新履歴

取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。

原文の要旨

In a recent paper by Rodrigues-Williams \& Hogan (RH94), a correlation between high-redshift, optically-selected QSOs and Zwicky clusters was reported at a very high significance level. Due to the fairly bright flux threshold of the cluster sample, these correlations cannot be interpreted as being due to an environmental effect of the clusters on the quasar activity. The most likely interpretation employed in RH94 was the effect of gravitational lensing by the foreground clusters, though the required magnification to explain the observed correlations has to be considerably higher than obtained from simple mass models for the clusters. We have repeated the analysis of RH94 using a different QSO sample, namely radio quasars and radio galaxies from the 1-Jy sample. In accordance with RH, we detect a statistically significant correlation between Zwicky clusters and 1-Jy sources with intermediate redshift ($z\approx 1$), but fail to detect significant effects for higher-redshift sources. In addition, we detect a highly significant underdensity of low-redshift radio sources around Zwicky clusters, for which an environmental interpretation seems to be most reasonable. Our result for the overdensity of $z\sim 1$ sources is in good agreement with previous results and can possibly be interpreted as a lensing effect, though we have not tried to quantitatively investigate a lensing model. Other interpretations, such as patchy dust obscuration, can not explain the observed effect and its tendency with redshift.

著者のコメント

21 pages, uudecoded postscriptfile, figures included, MPA preprint number 828

arXiv ID: astro-ph/9408096 / 要約の誤りについて