arXiv論文メモ
新着一覧
astro-ph · 査読状況未確認

画像復元の繰り返し計算を止める基準を提案

When Does the Richardson-Lucy Deconvolution Converge ?

Hongguang Bi, Gerhard Boerner (MPI fuer Astrophysik, GERMANY)

短い要約(全文訳を準備中)

リチャードソン・ルーシー法などでぼけを除く際、模擬データの再標本化により復元像と観測の適合度を評価する方法を提案した。反復を増やすと適合は改善するが滑らかさが失われるため、両方を見て停止を判断する。二例で手順を示し、尤度とエントロピーの和の最大化だけでは十分な適合を保証しないと指摘する。

v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。

初稿
1994-09-29(UTC)
最新改訂
1994-09-29 · v1
査読・掲載
査読状況未確認
arXivで読むPDF

更新履歴

取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。

原文の要旨

(\rl = Richardson-Lucy) We propose a simulation-based bootstrap method to access global significance levels of deconvolution models in the \rl and other iterative restoration algorithms that converge locally. These significance levels allow one to check at each iterative step how good the model is and when iterations can be stopped. Adding more iterations in the deconvolution improves the fitting but is very slow at later time; while too much entropy or smoothness will be lost in the models. A good deconvolution model should firstly have a significance level as high as possible ($\ge$ 20\%), and secondly, be as smooth as possible. We have used two examples to illustrate how such models can be derived in practice. We point out that maximizing the sum of the likelihood of fitting and {\em a priori} entropy does not guarantee an acceptable significance level for the resulting model. If one's {\em a priori} knowledge is too poor, the model may not be able to fit the data at a reasonable significance level. Instead, a maximum-entropy-like iterative restoration algorithm can be performed later by acquiring {\em a priori} knowledge from the \rl restoration. However, this is necessary only when it does increase the levels significantly.

著者のコメント

uuencoded tar+compressed file containing an 6 page paper + 7 figures, to be published soon in A&A, present address: Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Arizona, USA

arXiv ID: astro-ph/9409093 / 要約の誤りについて