宇宙構造の計算と観測を比べる統計手法の課題
Improved Ways to Compare Simulations to Data
短い要約(全文訳を準備中)
初期ゆらぎをガウス型とする宇宙構造形成モデルについて、シミュレーションと観測の比較方法を論じる。大きな尺度で同じ観測に合わせても、小さな非線形領域では予測差が大きいため、頑健で識別力があり解釈しやすい検定が必要だとする。計算の高速化、領域ごとの偶然差の管理、データへのアクセスも課題に挙げる。
v1の要旨から自動生成。本文の精読・人による確認は未実施。
- 初稿
- 1995-07-21(UTC)
- 最新改訂
- 1995-07-21 · v1
- 査読・掲載
- 査読状況未確認
更新履歴
- v1 1995-07-21 この版を読む
取得できた版を表示。版の更新は査読済みを意味しません。過去版の本文差分は未解析です。
原文の要旨
Theoretical models for structure formation with Gaussian initial fluctuations have been worked out in considerable detail and compared with observations on various scales. It is on nonlinear scales $\lsim 10 \ h^{-1}\ {\rm Mpc}$ that the greatest differences exist between $\Omega=1$ models that have been normalized to agree on the largest scales with the COBE data; here especially there is a need for better statistical tests which are simultaneously {\it robust}, {\it discriminatory}, and {\it interpretable}. The era at which galaxy and cluster formation occurs is also a critical test of some models. Needs for the future include faster and cleverer codes, better control of cosmic variance in simulations, better understanding of processes leading to galaxy formation, better ways of comparing observational data with models, and better access to observational and simulation data.
著者のコメント
9 pages, self-extracting uuencoded postscript, encoded with uufiles
arXiv ID: astro-ph/9507081 / 要約の誤りについて